By The Associated Press’s SUDHIN THANAWALA
Due to laws that restrict collaboration with federal immigration efforts, a judge said late Friday that the Trump administration could not refuse funds to Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and thirty other cities and counties.
A preliminary injunction prohibiting the administration from halting or restricting the use of federal funds for so-called sanctuary jurisdictions was extended by U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco. San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, and over a dozen additional cities and counties were shielded by his previous order.
The White House did not immediately respond to an email sent late Friday. Orrick stated in his decision that the administration had only argued that the initial injunction was incorrect and had not objected to a prolonged injunction. The initial order is being appealed.
Orrick also prevented two specific grant programs from being subject to immigration-related restrictions by the government.
In an effort to fulfill President Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to forcibly remove millions of people from the nation, the Trump administration has increased pressure on sanctuary areas.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are instructed by one of Trump’s executive orders to prevent federal funds from going to sanctuary jurisdictions. Every federal agency is also required by another order to make sure that funds given to state and local governments do not support so-called sanctuary laws that aim to prevent the deportation of illegal aliens.
The counties and cities who filed the lawsuit claimed that billions of dollars were at stake.
President Barack Obama nominated Orrick, who claimed that the executive orders and the administrative actions that implemented them constituted an unlawful threat of coercion.
Each of the more than 500 sanctuary jurisdictions on the list released by the Department of Homeland Security in May will be formally notified that the government has determined they are not in compliance. Additionally, it stated that if it thought they were in breach of any federal criminal statutes, it would notify them.
Officials couldn’t explain why Dauphin County was on that list.
After being criticized for including communities that have actively backed the administration’s strict immigration policies, the list was eventually taken down from the department’s website.
Due to their sanctuary policy, the Justice Department has also filed lawsuits against Los Angeles, New York, and other communities.
Although the terms “sanctuary cities” are not strictly defined, they often refer to locations that restrict collaboration with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.In order to identify individuals who are wanted for deportation and detain them for federal police, ICE enlists the assistance of state and local authorities while enforcing immigration laws worldwide.
More on politics
-
Trump says he will send in the troops to Baltimore, attacks Md. governor
-
When will the U.S. ban on TikTok take effect? Trump keeps moving the date
-
Pa. nuns, falsely charged with election fraud, win major award for political courage
-
Ghislaine Maxwell says she never saw Trump in any inappropriate setting
